<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Packages not using the default build flags: a taxonomy</title>
        <link>https://peertube.debian.social/videos/watch/94747f50-b570-4401-a46d-3725b88830b0</link>
        <description>by Emanuele Rocca At: DebConf25 https://debconf25.debconf.org/talks/126-packages-not-using-the-default-build-flags-a-taxonomy/ Whilst working on PAC/BTI enablement on arm64, we found a sizable number of packages in the Debian archive not using the default build flags (think CFLAGS and friends). Aim of this talk is presenting the problem and providing a taxonomy of the packages affected by it. Some little historical gems found in the Debian archive will be shown too. Authors of scientific/academic software and package maintainers are the main target audience, as well as anyone interested in helping out. Room: Petit amphi Scheduled start: 2025-07-15 15:30:00+02:00</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 07:45:34 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <docs>https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/rss2.html</docs>
        <generator>PeerTube - https://peertube.debian.social</generator>
        
        <copyright>All rights reserved, unless otherwise specified in the terms specified at https://peertube.debian.social/about and potential licenses granted by each content's rightholder.</copyright>
        <atom:link href="https://peertube.debian.social/feeds/video-comments.xml?videoId=94747f50-b570-4401-a46d-3725b88830b0" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    </channel>
</rss>